<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Puran Defrag &#8211; Fast, Efficient, Low-Cost Defragger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558</link>
	<description>News and notes about computing...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:20:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558&#038;cpage=1#comment-4275</link>
		<dc:creator>Gav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558#comment-4275</guid>
		<description>Installed Puran. Ran a boot defrag then defrag with all options enabled. End result added about 10 seconds to my boot time (Vista Home Premium). Ran Vista built in defrag a couple of times. Boot time restored to normal. I have found that all 3rd party defrag tools extend my boot time (PD2008, Disk Keeper, JF Defrag). Frankly I now just leave the std Vista defrag tool to run once per day at 4PM. This keeps things stable and fast/quick boot times for free!

PC Spec: OS Name	Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Home Premium
Version	6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001
Other OS Description 	Not Available
OS Manufacturer	Microsoft Corporation
System Name	GAV-PC
System Manufacturer	ECS
System Model	A770M-A
System Type	X86-based PC
Processor	AMD Phenom(tm) 9600 Quad-Core Processor, 2300 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)
BIOS Version/Date	American Megatrends Inc. 080014, 10/16/2007
SMBIOS Version	2.5

All HD&#039;s are SATA II.

Gav</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed Puran. Ran a boot defrag then defrag with all options enabled. End result added about 10 seconds to my boot time (Vista Home Premium). Ran Vista built in defrag a couple of times. Boot time restored to normal. I have found that all 3rd party defrag tools extend my boot time (PD2008, Disk Keeper, JF Defrag). Frankly I now just leave the std Vista defrag tool to run once per day at 4PM. This keeps things stable and fast/quick boot times for free!</p>
<p>PC Spec: OS Name	Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Home Premium<br />
Version	6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001<br />
Other OS Description 	Not Available<br />
OS Manufacturer	Microsoft Corporation<br />
System Name	GAV-PC<br />
System Manufacturer	ECS<br />
System Model	A770M-A<br />
System Type	X86-based PC<br />
Processor	AMD Phenom(tm) 9600 Quad-Core Processor, 2300 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s)<br />
BIOS Version/Date	American Megatrends Inc. 080014, 10/16/2007<br />
SMBIOS Version	2.5</p>
<p>All HD&#8217;s are SATA II.</p>
<p>Gav</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DooGie</title>
		<link>http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558&#038;cpage=1#comment-4270</link>
		<dc:creator>DooGie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558#comment-4270</guid>
		<description>Paul, I&#039;ve been trying out Puran Defrag recently and can confirm what Eric says.
It is very good indeed, in fact I ended up paying the license fee I liked it that much.
The only downside I&#039;ve noticed when compared to PerfectDisk is that the hard drive tends to get fragmented again slightly sooner with Puran than if I do a defrag with PD. That could possibly be down to my PC though and may not be typical for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I&#8217;ve been trying out Puran Defrag recently and can confirm what Eric says.<br />
It is very good indeed, in fact I ended up paying the license fee I liked it that much.<br />
The only downside I&#8217;ve noticed when compared to PerfectDisk is that the hard drive tends to get fragmented again slightly sooner with Puran than if I do a defrag with PD. That could possibly be down to my PC though and may not be typical for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric (a.k.a. TweakHound)</title>
		<link>http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558&#038;cpage=1#comment-4263</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric (a.k.a. TweakHound)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558#comment-4263</guid>
		<description>I neglected to mention there is a free 30-day trial:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.puransoftware.com/Puran-Defrag-Download.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.puransoftware.com/Puran-Defrag-Download.html&lt;/a&gt;
I hope you guys give it shot and let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I neglected to mention there is a free 30-day trial:<br />
<a href="http://www.puransoftware.com/Puran-Defrag-Download.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.puransoftware.com/Puran-Defrag-Download.html</a><br />
I hope you guys give it shot and let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric (a.k.a. TweakHound)</title>
		<link>http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558&#038;cpage=1#comment-4262</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric (a.k.a. TweakHound)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558#comment-4262</guid>
		<description>IMHO, It&#039;s just as good a PD and cheaper too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, It&#8217;s just as good a PD and cheaper too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558&#038;cpage=1#comment-4258</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tweakhound.com/blog/?p=558#comment-4258</guid>
		<description>So is it actually better or just cheaper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is it actually better or just cheaper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
